Skip to content

Refresh planner queue for 4695#4697

Merged
asim merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/planner-4695
Jul 11, 2026
Merged

Refresh planner queue for 4695#4697
asim merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/planner-4695

Conversation

@asim

@asim asim commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary:

  • Remove the completed Nack redelivery priority after Fix memory stream Nack ordering #4694 merged.
  • Keep provider failure resilience as the top open queue item.
  • Add the first-agent docs command CI verification issue to balance developer adoption with hardening.

Testing:

  • go build ./...
  • go test ./... (fails in this environment due loopback restrictions and atlascloud stream response)
  • golangci-lint run ./... (fails because installed linter was built with Go 1.24 while repo targets Go 1.25.12)

Closes #4695

@asim asim added the codex label Jul 11, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 11, 2026 12:30
@asim asim added the codex label Jul 11, 2026
@asim
asim merged commit c80d0c6 into master Jul 11, 2026
12 checks passed
@asim
asim deleted the codex/planner-4695 branch July 11, 2026 12:30
@asim asim mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the autonomous loop’s ranked work queue to reflect the completion of the Nack redelivery work (via #4694) and to reprioritize upcoming reliability/DX work tracked in open issues.

Changes:

  • Removes the completed “Fix in-memory stream Nack redelivery ordering” queue item.
  • Promotes “Harden agent provider failure resilience” (#4650) to the top queue item and updates its progress context.
  • Adds “Verify first-agent docs commands in CI” (#4696) as a new queue item to protect the documented developer on-ramp.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loop: planning review #179

3 participants