Skip to content

Fix "no method matching" test#288

Merged
vtjnash merged 2 commits into
JuliaSparse:mainfrom
apaz-cli:ap/testfix
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Fix "no method matching" test#288
vtjnash merged 2 commits into
JuliaSparse:mainfrom
apaz-cli:ap/testfix

Conversation

@apaz-cli

@apaz-cli apaz-cli commented Nov 17, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Right now we're thinking about changing the MethodError message. Unfortunately, this breaks a lot of tests, including this one. Discussion at JuliaLang/julia#47369.

If the change below does happen, merge this PR afterwards.
JuliaLang/julia@44367ce

Comment thread test/higherorderfns.jl Outdated
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Nov 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #288 (8703152) into main (311b4b4) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #288      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.76%   93.78%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        7334     7335       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         6877     6879       +2     
+ Misses        457      456       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sparsevector.jl 95.01% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
src/SparseArrays.jl 82.35% <0.00%> (+5.88%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ViralBShah

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vtjnash is this good to merge?

@vtjnash
vtjnash merged commit 102ded6 into JuliaSparse:main Feb 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants