Updated LZ4 plugin - #394
Merged
Merged
Conversation
t20100
force-pushed
the
update-lz4-upstream
branch
from
June 23, 2026 07:35
a3e1acf to
0cdfb8d
Compare
t20100
marked this pull request as ready for review
June 23, 2026 07:35
t20100
force-pushed
the
update-lz4-upstream
branch
from
June 23, 2026 07:37
0cdfb8d to
765bf7f
Compare
Member
Author
|
Only copying a small part of In the future, we should consider relying on the hdf group's hdf5_plugins repository. |
This was referenced Jun 23, 2026
payno
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR changes upstream project for the LZ4 from the initial repository (https://github.com/nexusformat/HDF5-External-Filter-Plugins) to the version hosted by the hdfgroup organisation (https://github.com/HDFGroup/hdf5_plugins).
The reason is that the former project is stalled while the later is actively maintained.
As raised in #326 this has consequences on performances.
Running the sample code from #326 (comment) shows performance improvement:
closes #326