Skip to content

Put internal lints into a single combined pass - #158056

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
nnethercote:InternalCombined
Jun 18, 2026
Merged

Put internal lints into a single combined pass#158056
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits into
rust-lang:mainfrom
nnethercote:InternalCombined

Conversation

@nnethercote

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Details in individual commits.

r? @Urgau

This makes it consistent with the other late internal lints.

It doesn't need to be a crate-level pass because it doesn't implement
`check_crate` or `check_crate_post` and/or track any crate-level
information.
Instead of N separate passes. This is more efficient for bootstrapping.
It also matches what is done for builtin lints
(`BuiltinCombined*LintPass`).
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 18, 2026
@nnethercote

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 18, 2026
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
Put internal lints into a single combined pass
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 3481834 (34818340bc657ce5e186499f0125221176b83243)
Base parent: f7da3c0 (f7da3c0d4b3a4cc291f8c800cc61549d27d14c49)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3481834): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -5.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-5.0% [-5.0%, -5.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -5.0% [-5.0%, -5.0%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 22.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
22.6% [22.6%, 22.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 522.85s -> 520.933s (-0.37%)
Artifact size: 401.92 MiB -> 401.83 MiB (-0.02%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 18, 2026
@nnethercote

nnethercote commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The only perf effect this might have had was speeding up bootstrap. The CI run suggests not much happened there -- any effect is below the noise threshold. Still worth merging from a consistency standpoint, I think.

@Urgau Urgau left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Urgau

Urgau commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r+

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit afd8ef5 has been approved by Urgau

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 18, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
Put internal lints into a single combined pass

Details in individual commits.

r? @Urgau
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
Put internal lints into a single combined pass

Details in individual commits.

r? @Urgau
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
Put internal lints into a single combined pass

Details in individual commits.

r? @Urgau
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #158056 (Put internal lints into a single combined pass)
 - #151132 (Take care to use MSG_EOR with SOCK_SEQPACKET sockets)
 - #157644 (wasm32-wasip1-threads: Correct llvm target name)
 - #157912 (stabilize str_from_utf16_endian)
 - #158048 (Revert "add regression test for Redundant memory strores with mut parameters in by-value returns")
 - #158051 (Document `with_added_extension` edge cases)
 - #158054 (fix unresolved import suggestion before outer attributes)
 - #158062 (rustc book: Update wasm32-wasip1-threads's maintainers list)
@rust-bors
rust-bors Bot merged commit b4f9767 into rust-lang:main Jun 18, 2026
14 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.98.0 milestone Jun 18, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
Rollup merge of #158056 - nnethercote:InternalCombined, r=Urgau

Put internal lints into a single combined pass

Details in individual commits.

r? @Urgau
@nnethercote
nnethercote deleted the InternalCombined branch June 18, 2026 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants