Tracking issue for String::split_off

[clarfonthey]

For PR #38056.

cc @alexcrichton

[brson]

@rfcbot fcp merge

Mirrors an existing vec function. It looks to me like the argument name needs to be changed for one of them to be consistent ("mid" vs "at").

[rfcbot]

Team member @brson has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

• @BurntSushi
• @Kimundi
• @alexcrichton
• @aturon
• @brson
• @sfackler

No concerns currently listed.

Once these reviewers reach consensus, this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

[clarfonthey]

Adding to what @brson said, Vec::split_off uses at, whereas str::split_at and slice::split_at use mid. Perhaps the original split_off should be changed to mid?

[rfcbot]

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔