Code
fn main() {
let numbers = vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
let threshold = 3;
// This should use >= but mistakenly uses =>
let position = numbers.iter().position(|x| x => &threshold);
println!("{:?}", position);
}
Current output
Error: Exit code 1
error: expected one of `!`, `)`, `,`, `.`, `::`, `?`, `{`, or an operator, found `=>`
--> minimal_example.rs:9:50
|
9 | let position = numbers.iter().position(|x| x => &threshold);
| ^^ expected one of 8 possible tokens
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
Desired output
error: expected one of `!`, `)`, `,`, `.`, `::`, `?`, `{`, or an operator, found `=>`
--> minimal_example.rs:9:50
|
9 | let position = numbers.iter().position(|x| x => &threshold);
| ^^
| |
| unexpected token
| help: did you mean `>=`?
Rationale and extra context
This kind of simple syntax mistake should be straightforward to identify, and the suggestion is simple. But it's still useful for those who are new to the language (or for LLM assistants).
This type of "did you mean" suggestion seems in line with other similar suggestions the compiler makes. The only possible difference I can see is that this occurs during tokenisation rather than at some later stage.
Other cases
Rust Version
$ rustc --version --verbose
rustc 1.91.0 (f8297e351 2025-10-28)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: f8297e351a40c1439a467bbbb6879088047f50b3
commit-date: 2025-10-28
host: aarch64-apple-darwin
release: 1.91.0
LLVM version: 21.1.2
Anything else?
No response
Code
Current output
Desired output
Rationale and extra context
This kind of simple syntax mistake should be straightforward to identify, and the suggestion is simple. But it's still useful for those who are new to the language (or for LLM assistants).
This type of "did you mean" suggestion seems in line with other similar suggestions the compiler makes. The only possible difference I can see is that this occurs during tokenisation rather than at some later stage.
Other cases
Rust Version
Anything else?
No response