Skip to content

Bump byteorder and remove no-op feature#948

Merged
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
mati865:patch-1
Sep 13, 2019
Merged

Bump byteorder and remove no-op feature#948
bors merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:masterfrom
mati865:patch-1

Conversation

@mati865

@mati865 mati865 commented Sep 12, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It's automatically detected: BurntSushi/byteorder@5b3ffee

With this PR byteorder can be from rustc-workspace-hack.

Comment thread Cargo.toml
directories = { version = "2.0", optional = true }
rustc_version = { version = "0.2.3", optional = true }
getrandom = { version = "0.1.8", features = ["std"] }
byteorder = "1.3"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In terms of versions, isn't this a NOP? 1.3 is semver-compatible with 1.1.

Also it is possible that we had to add the feature to make sure we use the exact same feature as other projects in the rustc workspace. So I am not sure that we can just remove it here...

@RalfJung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh I see, the feature became a NOP with byteorder 1.3. That makes sense.

@RalfJung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors r+

@bors

bors commented Sep 13, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 247ac22 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors

bors commented Sep 13, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 247ac22 with merge b1d35d5...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2019
@bors

bors commented Sep 13, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: RalfJung
Pushing b1d35d5 to master...

@bors
bors merged commit 247ac22 into rust-lang:master Sep 13, 2019
@mati865
mati865 deleted the patch-1 branch October 24, 2019 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants