Bump base ui version for internal components

[carlosabadia]

No description provided.

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Summary

This PR bumps the @base-ui/react package version from 1.4.1 to 1.5.0 used by internal Reflex components that are built on Base UI's headless React component library.

• The single-line change updates PACKAGE_VERSION in base_ui.py, which propagates through lib_dependencies to all 21 BaseUIComponent subclasses (Accordion, Avatar, Checkbox, Dialog, Menu, Select, Tooltip, etc.).

Confidence Score: 5/5

This PR is safe to merge — it is a minimal one-line version bump with no logic changes.

The change touches a single constant that propagates through lib_dependencies to all BaseUIComponent subclasses. The bump is from a patch-adjacent minor release (1.4.1 → 1.5.0) with no changes to the Python integration layer, so the risk surface is limited to any upstream API changes in the new npm package version.

No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
packages/reflex-components-internal/src/reflex_components_internal/components/base_ui.py	Single-line version bump of PACKAGE_VERSION from 1.4.1 to 1.5.0; no logic changes.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    A["base_ui.py\nPACKAGE_VERSION = '1.5.0'"] --> B["BaseUIComponent\nlib_dependencies: ['@base-ui/react@1.5.0']"]
    B --> C[Accordion]
    B --> D[Avatar]
    B --> E[Checkbox / Switch]
    B --> F[Dialog / Drawer]
    B --> G[Menu / ContextMenu]
    B --> H[Select / Combobox]
    B --> I[Tooltip / Popover]
    B --> J["...13 more components"]

Loading

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Bump base ui version for internal compon..." | Re-trigger Greptile}

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 24 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing carlos/bump-reflex-internal-1-5-0 (33156e0) with main (fc7221a)}

[masenf]

we need to be updating the frontend lock files when frontend dependencies are changing.

i was testing this out and finding that it was not installing the new version of the library, so i was looking into that bug. i will keep scoping that out and send a follow up

[masenf]

follow on #6543