Skip to content

Triggers: Re-expose radius - #254

Merged
DanAlbert merged 1 commit into
pydcs:masterfrom
Raffson:quad-point-triggers
Aug 24, 2022
Merged

Triggers: Re-expose radius#254
DanAlbert merged 1 commit into
pydcs:masterfrom
Raffson:quad-point-triggers

Conversation

@Raffson

@Raffson Raffson commented Aug 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Concurrent push/merge in last PR caused some troubles...

@Raffson

Raffson commented Aug 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Jeez, it's messed up again... first commit is empty -_-

@Raffson
Raffson force-pushed the quad-point-triggers branch from 5624db5 to e009f5c Compare August 22, 2022 19:33
@Raffson

Raffson commented Aug 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@DanAlbert Ok this ought to be it, recommend squashing the following commits:

6c61391
ba47b35
dacf650

The first two should cancel each other out, leaving you with changes from 'Add test_point_in_poly for mapping.Polygon'.

The miz includes a radius for all trigger zone types.
@Raffson
Raffson force-pushed the quad-point-triggers branch from e009f5c to 73ab5c7 Compare August 24, 2022 20:02
@Raffson

Raffson commented Aug 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Test has been extracted, this goes to my next PR cause after expanding it some more I ran into some problems with the algorithm for 'point_in_poly'.

@DanAlbert
DanAlbert merged commit e2cdd03 into pydcs:master Aug 24, 2022
@Raffson
Raffson deleted the quad-point-triggers branch September 3, 2022 20:42
rp- pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2026
QuadPoint forwarded args to the parent positionally, so an explicit heading
landed in the parent's radius slot (added by PR #254) and link_unit_id was lost.
Forward by keyword and pass radius=0, the DCS-canonical value for quad zones.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants