Mark PhotoCleaner Operational After the Promotion of the b09078e Resync

[ptr727]

Follow-up to #723 after ptr727/PhotoCleaner#51 promoted develop to main (f56178a), carrying ptr727/PhotoCleaner#50 and ptr727/PhotoCleaner#52.

spec/audit.py PhotoCleaner at hub b09078e reports clean at main (audit run 2026-08-15T18:43:20Z | hub b09078e) and at develop, including the two hub-only workflow findings that #736 settled. The report moves to operational: readme-structure and agent-instruction-set to pass, no defects, no drift, nothing in flight. It records the one-round dead-path block on the promotion (#721, fixed by #731, cleared by a re-run since the gate reads rules from hub develop) and closes both escalations (#721, #722). The registry entry is unchanged: status stays cataloged (the schema's only non-backlog value) and both driftNotes still describe reality (publish shape, private-for-now) and assert no outstanding work.

Report lints clean (markdownlint, prose_lint), and spec/validate.py passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates the PhotoCleaner audit report to reflect that develop has been promoted to main and the repository now audits as operational/clean under hub b09078e.

Changes:

• Refreshes the audited branch SHA, verdict, and run stamp for the latest audit run.
• Updates drift/convergence/escalation sections to reflect that promotion-related blockers are resolved and the audit is now clean.

Suppressed comments (2)

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:15

• This line adds an inline Markdown link ([text](url)), but inline links are disallowed here per the repo's reference-style link rule (allowed inline-link exceptions are AGENTS.md, GOVERNANCE.md, OPERATIONS.md, and .github/copilot-instructions.md). Prefer a reference-style link or plain text reference (see .agents/skills/comment-and-doc-style/references/markdown-links.md:9-15,57-65).

The promotion was blocked for one round by the prose gate's `dead-path` rule flagging verbatim mentions of the retired `repo-config/configure.sh`, filed as [#721](https://github.com/ptr727/ProjectTemplate/issues/721) and fixed by #731. The gate fetches its rules from hub `develop` on a `develop`-targeted run, so a re-run cleared it with no repo change. Copilot read 18 of 19 changed files on the promotion in both rounds and raised no thread. Its one suppressed finding, a Mermaid edge in the hub-carried `WORKFLOW.md` diagram, was answered on the pull request as declined, since the diagram is hub content and the D1 text beside it already states the rule.

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:57

• These list items use inline Markdown links ([text](url)), which violates the repo's reference-style link rule for Markdown files outside the four allowed exceptions. Use reference-style links (with definitions at the bottom) or plain text references instead (see .agents/skills/comment-and-doc-style/references/markdown-links.md:9-15,57-65).

1. [#721](https://github.com/ptr727/ProjectTemplate/issues/721): `prose_lint.py dead-path` could not recognize a hub-hosted path in a repo that retired the file, so verbatim text naming `repo-config/configure.sh` failed a downstream promotion gate. Fixed by #731.
2. [#722](https://github.com/ptr727/ProjectTemplate/issues/722): the hub's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` linked `GOVERNANCE.md#every-finding-ends-in-an-action`, an anchor that left `GOVERNANCE.md` when PR Review Etiquette was packaged as a Skill. PhotoCleaner re-pointed its copy in #50 after Copilot raised it, and #52 carried the canonical wording #730 landed.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

[ptr727]

Answering the two suppressed findings (reports/photocleaner/audit.md:15 and :57, inline Markdown links outside the four permitted files): fixed in 8dd6c99 together with the threaded one, by converting every inline link in the report to a bare owner/repo#N or #N reference.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (2)

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:15

• Grammar: "raised no thread" should be plural, since it refers to the absence of any review threads.

The promotion was blocked for one round by the prose gate's `dead-path` rule flagging verbatim mentions of the retired `repo-config/configure.sh`, filed as #721 and fixed by #731. The gate fetches its rules from hub `develop` on a `develop`-targeted run, so a re-run cleared it with no repo change. Copilot read 18 of 19 changed files on the promotion in both rounds and raised no thread. Its one suppressed finding, a Mermaid edge in the hub-carried `WORKFLOW.md` diagram, was answered on the pull request as declined, since the diagram is hub content and the D1 text beside it already states the rule.

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:57

• Grammar: "the canonical wording #730 landed" is missing a connector word and reads ungrammatically; add "that" (or similar) to clarify the reference.

2. #722: the hub's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` linked `GOVERNANCE.md#every-finding-ends-in-an-action`, an anchor that left `GOVERNANCE.md` when PR Review Etiquette was packaged as a Skill. PhotoCleaner re-pointed its copy in #50 after Copilot raised it, and #52 carried the canonical wording #730 landed.

[ptr727]

Answering the two suppressed findings on head 8dd6c99 (reports/photocleaner/audit.md:15 "raised no thread" and :57 "the canonical wording #730 landed"): both accepted and fixed in cf7044d, "raised no threads" and "the canonical wording that #730 landed".

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (1)

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:54

• This section says "Two hub findings from this pass" but the report above states the current audit run is clean (no findings). These escalations appear to be historical carry-forward from the earlier snapshot, so the wording is misleading.

Two hub findings from this pass, filed rather than patched per repo, both closed since:

[ptr727]

Answering the suppressed finding on head cf7044d (reports/photocleaner/audit.md:54, "Two hub findings from this pass" reading as current findings): accepted and fixed in 4b1882c, the sentence now says the two escalations were surfaced by the resync the report measures and closed before this run, so neither is a finding of the current audit.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Suppressed comments (4)

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:19

• These unqualified #49/#50/#52 references will auto-link to issues/PRs in this repository, but they appear to be PhotoCleaner PR numbers (the surrounding text is about PhotoCleaner resync/promotions). Use ptr727/PhotoCleaner#… so the references resolve correctly.

Judged at `main`. Type-dimension checks are hand-judged per AUDIT.md section 4 and are unchanged from the 2026-08-01 snapshot, since #49, #50, and #52 touched governance and configuration only.

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:46

• Unqualified #50/#52/#51 will auto-link to ProjectTemplate issues/PRs, but this line is summarizing PhotoCleaner PR state. Use ptr727/PhotoCleaner#… so the links point to the correct repository.

None. #50, #52 (to `develop`) and #51 (`develop -> main`) are merged.

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:57

• #50 and #52 here will auto-link to ProjectTemplate issues/PRs, but this sentence is describing actions taken in the PhotoCleaner repository. Use explicit ptr727/PhotoCleaner#… references so readers land on the right PRs.

2. #722: the hub's `.github/copilot-instructions.md` linked `GOVERNANCE.md#every-finding-ends-in-an-action`, an anchor that left `GOVERNANCE.md` when PR Review Etiquette was packaged as a Skill. PhotoCleaner re-pointed its copy in #50 after Copilot raised it, and #52 carried the canonical wording that #730 landed.

reports/photocleaner/audit.md:13

• Unqualified #51 will auto-link to ProjectTemplate issue/PR 51, but this sentence is describing a PhotoCleaner promotion PR. Use an explicit owner/repo#N reference so the link resolves to the intended repository.

This issue also appears in the following locations of the same file:

• line 19
• line 46
• line 57

`develop` vs `main`: identical content, since #51 merged `develop` at `ab23034` and nothing has landed since. The audit at `develop` reports zero findings.

[ptr727]

Answering the four suppressed findings on head 4b1882c (reports/photocleaner/audit.md:13, :19, :46, :57, bare #N PhotoCleaner pull request numbers autolinking into this repository): accepted and fixed in ef1bf5d, every PhotoCleaner reference in the report now reads ptr727/PhotoCleaner#N, including the older ones the earlier snapshot carried.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.