fix(auth): harden X.509 workload identity integration - #3740
fix(auth): harden X.509 workload identity integration#3740jbeckwith-oai wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Castiron custom code✅ No new custom-code files detected. 34 mixed files remain; 1 existing customization changed. Compared
33 existing customizations unchanged
A changed generated baseline means this report cannot reliably identify which handwritten lines changed. Inspect the custom-code diffDownload the exact patch produced by this run (requires repository access): gh run download 33041002003 --repo openai/openai-python \
--name castiron-custom-code-33041002003-1 --dir /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33041002003-1
git apply --stat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33041002003-1/custom-code.patch
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-33041002003-1/custom-code.patchOr reproduce it from an SDK checkout containing the vendored reporter: git fetch --no-tags origin 79c588bb3a40fb698c65e35c94ad96c0b44c30d4 65f5d417dddab81e120374a17c5e8891f6027529
python3 scripts/castiron/custom_code_report.py report \
--base 79c588bb3a40fb698c65e35c94ad96c0b44c30d4 \
--head 65f5d417dddab81e120374a17c5e8891f6027529 --fetch --require-head-hash --public \
--out /tmp/castiron-custom-code-65f5d417ddda
cat /tmp/castiron-custom-code-65f5d417ddda/custom-code.patchThis is the current full custom patch for mixed files, not an attribution of only the handwritten lines changed by this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b5ec9be738
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Summary
Validation