Skip to content

Refresh planner priorities after retry hardening#4704

Merged
asim merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/planner-4703
Jul 11, 2026
Merged

Refresh planner priorities after retry hardening#4704
asim merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
codex/planner-4703

Conversation

@asim

@asim asim commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary:

  • Remove the completed broad provider resilience item after Harden retry cancellation during backoff #4702 merged.
  • Promote first-agent docs command verification as the top developer-adoption item.
  • Keep the AtlasCloud plan/delegate recovery issue in the queue as the next provider-operability gap.

Testing:

  • go build ./...
  • go test ./... (fails in this environment: loopback targets forbidden in grpc tests; AtlasCloud stream returned 400)
  • golangci-lint run ./... (fails: linter built with Go 1.24, target is Go 1.25.12)

Closes #4703

@asim asim added the codex label Jul 11, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 11, 2026 13:40
@asim
asim merged commit f88f7d1 into master Jul 11, 2026
13 checks passed
@asim asim mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the autonomous improvement loop’s ranked work queue to reflect the completion of the broad provider resilience effort (via #4702) and to re-focus the next iteration work on developer adoption and the next concrete provider-operability gap.

Changes:

  • Removes the completed “Harden agent provider failure resilience” queue item after #4702.
  • Promotes “Verify first-agent docs commands in CI” to the top priority with refreshed scope/guardrails.
  • Adds/keeps “Harden AtlasCloud plan-delegate tool-call recovery” as the next provider-operability item.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Loop: planning review #180

3 participants