Skip to content

gossipsub creates a permanent topics-map entry per distinct subscription with no cap in the default config

High
tabcat published GHSA-x2vm-cf3p-m2w8 Aug 18, 2026

Package

npm @libp2p/gossipsub (npm)

Affected versions

<17.0.0

Patched versions

>=17.0.0

Description

Summary

A single gossipsub peer can grow a node's topics map without bound by flooding subscription RPCs, because the default configuration has no global, per-peer, or topic-length cap and peer scoring does not penalise subscription volume. The peer is never greylisted, so the growth continues toward OOM.

Details

handleReceivedSubscription (packages/gossipsub/src/gossipsub.ts:1028, line 1036) runs this.topics.set(topic, new Set()) for every distinct topic string:

private handleReceivedSubscription (from, topic, subscribe) {
  let topicSet = this.topics.get(topic)
  if (subscribe) {
    if (topicSet == null) {
      topicSet = new Set()
      this.topics.set(topic, topicSet)   // no global cap, no per-peer cap
    }
    topicSet.add(from.toString())
  }
}

The only topical gate (gossipsub.ts:981, if (this.allowedTopics != null && !this.allowedTopics.has(topic)) return) is skipped when allowedTopics is null — the default. Subscriptions are unsigned RPC metadata (no signature needed); decodeRpc's per-RPC limit caps count (maxSubscriptions = 5000) but not topic-string length or aggregate size; and the peer-scoring components P1–P7 have no subscription-volume term, so the attacker's score stays at 0 (above the graylistThreshold of −80) and acceptFrom keeps returning true. Verified on js-libp2p commit a04f5e0, where @libp2p/gossipsub reads 16.0.4.

PoC

Full PoC attached (gossipsub-topics-unbounded-growth-poc.tar.gz). Build the js-libp2p monorepo at the affected version (npm install --ignore-scripts && npm run build), extract the package inside the monorepo root (sibling of packages/), then cd gossipsub-topics-unbounded-growth-poc && node attack.mjs. Expected (default config):

[*] sending 300 RPC frames x 4000 unique ~190-byte topic subscriptions (1,200,000 topics total)
[*]   progress: 88% sent | victim topics=1,032,000 rss=740MB peers=1
[*] victim quiesced: topics=~1,100,000 rss=~870MB peers=1
[!] Vulnerability reproduced: one connected peer grew the victim's gossipsub topics map to ~1.1M entries (RSS +~900MB) with 300 subscription RPCs — no global, per-peer, or topic-length cap in the default config

Control run (ALLOWED_TOPICS=legit-topic, i.e. node attack.mjs control): the identical flood is rejected at the allowedTopics gate and the topics map stays at 0 entries — confirming the vulnerable condition is the default allowedTopics-unset config. The map grows monotonically with no cap until the victim's own resource pressure trips; on disconnect removePeer performs an O(N) sweep over every topic entry (a secondary CPU cost) while the ~1 GB heap stays committed.

Impact

CWE-400/CWE-770. Every node running default gossipsub is affected; the attacker needs only one connection and is never rate-limited or greylisted. Growth continues toward OOM; on disconnect the O(N) removePeer sweep adds CPU cost. Suggested fix: bound by default (not opt-in) — a global cap on topics.size, a per-peer subscription cap with a P7 behaviour penalty so acceptFrom eventually greylists, a topic-string length cap at decode time, and/or flipping allowedTopics to deny-by-default; make removePeer's topic iteration non-blocking/capped.

gossipsub-topics-unbounded-growth-poc.tar.gz

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE ID

No known CVE

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits