-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
A4-7-1: Identify guards for shift operations #396
Copy link
Copy link
Closed
Labels
Difficulty-MediumA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take 1-5 days effort to addressA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take 1-5 days effort to addressImpact-Mediumfalse positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.An issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding StandardsIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Difficulty-MediumA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take 1-5 days effort to addressA false positive or false negative report which is expected to take 1-5 days effort to addressImpact-Mediumfalse positive/false negativeAn issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.An issue related to observed false positives or false negatives.user-reportIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding StandardsIssue reported by an end user of CodeQL Coding Standards
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Projects
Status
Done
Affected rules
A4-7-1Description
The
IntegerExpressionLeadToDataLoss.qlquery does not detect/identify guards for shift operations.We already implement appropriate guards in the C rule
INT34-C, and we should consider combining the implementations.Example