Skip to content

Improve VulnerabilityMatcher#783

Merged
ArBridgeman merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/777_improve_vulnerability_matcher
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

Improve VulnerabilityMatcher#783
ArBridgeman merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/777_improve_vulnerability_matcher

Conversation

@ArBridgeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

closes #777

Checklist

Note: If any of the items in the checklist are not relevant to your PR, just check the box.

For any Pull Request

Is the following correct:

  • the title of the Pull Request?
  • the title of the corresponding issue?
  • there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • that the issue which this Pull Request fixes ("Fixes...") is mentioned?

When Changes Were Made

Did you:

  • update the changelog?
  • update the cookiecutter-template?
  • update the implementation?
  • check coverage and add tests: unit tests and, if relevant, integration tests?
  • update the User Guide & other documentation?
  • resolve any failing CI criteria (incl. Sonar quality gate)?

When Preparing a Release

Have you:

  • thought about version number (major, minor, patch)?
  • checked Exasol packages for updates and resolved open vulnerabilities, if easily possible?

Comment thread test/unit/util/dependencies/track_vulnerabilities_test.py Outdated
@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman force-pushed the feature/777_improve_vulnerability_matcher branch from 9443337 to d8463eb Compare April 16, 2026 09:37
@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman enabled auto-merge (squash) April 16, 2026 09:52
@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman merged commit fcc5cfa into main Apr 16, 2026
68 checks passed
@ArBridgeman ArBridgeman deleted the feature/777_improve_vulnerability_matcher branch April 16, 2026 09:56
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improve vulnerability matching to consider potentially multiple resolutions

2 participants