Skip to content

Allow explicit operations only between int128_t and uint128_t#340

Merged
mborland merged 12 commits into
developfrom
337
Mar 3, 2026
Merged

Allow explicit operations only between int128_t and uint128_t#340
mborland merged 12 commits into
developfrom
337

Conversation

@mborland

@mborland mborland commented Mar 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes: #337
Closes: #338

@mborland mborland added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Mar 2, 2026
@mborland mborland added the Bug Something isn't working label Mar 2, 2026
@cppalliance-bot

cppalliance-bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://340.int128.prtest3.cppalliance.org/libs/int128/doc/html/index.html

If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL.

2026-03-02 23:47:10 UTC

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.05%. Comparing base (f7dc6f2) to head (dd01ce0).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #340      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    99.03%   99.05%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files           64       66       +2     
  Lines         5402     5526     +124     
  Branches      1688     1742      +54     
===========================================
+ Hits          5350     5474     +124     
  Misses          21       21              
  Partials        31       31              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mborland
mborland merged commit ada3435 into develop Mar 3, 2026
76 checks passed
@mborland
mborland deleted the 337 branch March 3, 2026 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow operations between types when sign macros are defined Conversions between int128_t and uint128_t should be explicit only

2 participants