Skip to content

Bump go - #1127

Merged
praveenrewar merged 1 commit into
carvel-dev:v0.65.xfrom
praveenrewar:bump-go-v0.65.x
May 14, 2026
Merged

Bump go#1127
praveenrewar merged 1 commit into
carvel-dev:v0.65.xfrom
praveenrewar:bump-go-v0.65.x

Conversation

@praveenrewar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


Additional Notes for your reviewer:

Review Checklist:
  • Follows the developer guidelines
  • Relevant tests are added or updated
  • Relevant docs in this repo added or updated
  • Relevant carvel.dev docs added or updated in a separate PR and there's
    a link to that PR
  • Code is at least as readable and maintainable as it was before this
    change

Additional documentation e.g., Proposal, usage docs, etc.:


Signed-off-by: Praveen Rewar <8457124+praveenrewar@users.noreply.github.com>
@praveenrewar
praveenrewar merged commit d6706e1 into carvel-dev:v0.65.x May 14, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Closed in Carvel May 14, 2026
@praveenrewar
praveenrewar deleted the bump-go-v0.65.x branch May 14, 2026 19:47
@joaopapereira

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Is this also in develop? Not sure why we created this branch given there are not change in develop that cannot be used in 0.65.x

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the carvel triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity label May 14, 2026
@praveenrewar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Is this also in develop? Not sure why we created this branch given there are not change in develop that cannot be used in 0.65.x

Yeah, I am not sure why there was a branch, the last release was made from this branch so didn't want to diverge now.
For develop I am planning to bump to go 1.26.3 itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

carvel triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants