Close Catalan translation gap

[ecodina]

Closes the Catalan gap on main.

@oscarhernandezrodriguez could you please review it?

I have a couple of questions:

1. Do I need to manually port it to v3-2-test as it was previously done for v3.1?
2. The English version has removed the "error_other" (line 48 of components.json). I have removed it from Catalan as well. Is this correct?

Thanks!

---

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• [ x ] Yes (please specify the tool below)

Generated-by: Codex following the guidelines

---

• Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
• For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
• When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
• For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

[jscheffl]

• Do I need to manually port it to v3-2-test as it was previously done for v3.1?

• The English version has removed the "error_other" (line 48 of components.json). I have removed it from Catalan as well. Is this correct?

Regarding 1) Probably v3-2-test branch as maintenance is very close to main as it has been branched off only 2 weeks ago. Atm a normal backport probably is sufficient ... but it will drift over time. (in the future)

Regarding 2) Yes, correct.

[jscheffl]

Looks (technically) good, would merge after a language expert review

[ecodina]

Thanks Jens! Oscar should probably be able to review it tomorrow or Tuesday.

[eladkal]

Do I need to manually port it to v3-2-test as it was previously done for v3.1?

Only if the automatic backport doesn't work.

[oscarhernandezrodriguez]

It looks OK to me.

[github-actions]

Backport successfully created: v3-2-test

Note: As of Merging PRs targeted for Airflow 3.X
the committer who merges the PR is responsible for backporting the PRs that are bug fixes (generally speaking) to the maintenance branches.

In matter of doubt please ask in #release-management Slack channel.

Status	Branch	Result
✅	v3-2-test

[jscheffl]

Do I need to manually port it to v3-2-test as it was previously done for v3.1?

Only if the automatic backport doesn't work.

@eladkal not fully correct, you can see already the v3-2-test drifted a bit from main, made a correction commit and one TODO is there when using "plain backport". See #65389, second commit