Skip to content

HTTPX2: Multipart part header injection via unvalidated file Content-Type and custom headers

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 18, 2026 in pydantic/httpx2 • Updated Sep 8, 2026

Package

pip httpx2 (pip)

Affected versions

< 2.11.0

Patched versions

2.11.0

Description

Summary

HTTPX2 serializes the per-file Content-Type and custom headers supplied through the files= tuple API directly into the multipart/form-data body without validating custom header names or values. An attacker who can influence upload metadata passed to HTTPX2 can use CR or LF characters to terminate a multipart part header and inject additional part headers or end the part header block early.

Details

The three-element file tuple accepts (filename, content, content_type), and the four-element form accepts (filename, content, content_type, headers). FileField.render_headers() interpolates the supplied header names and values between CRLF delimiters without validating them.

For example:

import httpx2

request = httpx2.Request(
    "POST",
    "https://example.com/upload",
    headers={"Content-Type": "multipart/form-data; boundary=BOUNDARY"},
    files={
        "file": (
            "safe.txt",
            b"payload",
            "text/plain\r\nX-Injected: true",
        )
    },
)

print(request.read().decode())

The generated body contains an attacker-injected part header:

--BOUNDARY
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="safe.txt"
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Injected: true

payload
--BOUNDARY--

The same issue affects names and values in the custom header mapping from the four-element tuple.

Field names and filenames are serialized through a separate escaping path and do not permit CRLF header injection.

Impact

Applications are affected when they pass attacker-controlled upload metadata into the per-file content_type or custom headers arguments. The receiving server interprets injected lines as genuine multipart part headers. Depending on how that server validates and processes uploads, this can alter part semantics or bypass checks based on part headers.

This does not split the outer HTTP request: the injected headers are contained within the multipart body. The concrete security impact therefore depends on the downstream multipart parser and application behavior.

Mitigation

Upgrade to HTTPX2 2.11.0 or later. Patched versions reject forbidden control characters in multipart part header names and values and raise ValueError before serializing the request.

If upgrading is not immediately possible, applications should validate custom multipart header names as HTTP field-name tokens. They should reject NUL, CR, LF, other C0 controls except horizontal tab, and DEL in per-file content types and custom header values before passing them to HTTPX2.

References

@Kludex Kludex published to pydantic/httpx2 Aug 18, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 2, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 8, 2026
Reviewed Sep 8, 2026
Last updated Sep 8, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(36th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-84379

GHSA ID

GHSA-h4x7-gw46-3wm6

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.