V5.10 xoclv2 011921 - #2
Closed
houlz0507 wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2022
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
The lag_lock is taken from both process and softirq contexts which results lockdep warning[0] about potential deadlock. However, just disabling softirqs by using *_bh spinlock API is not enough since it will cause warning in some contexts where the lock is obtained with hard irqs disabled. To fix the issue save current irq state, disable them before obtaining the lock an re-enable irqs from saved state after releasing it. [0]: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ================================ [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] 5.19.0_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_04_16_06 #1 Not tainted [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] -------------------------------- [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] swapper/0/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ffffffffa06dc0d8 (lag_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb+0x1f/0x120 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5_lag_add_netdev+0x13b/0x480 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5e_nic_enable+0x114/0x470 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5e_attach_netdev+0x30e/0x6a0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5e_resume+0x105/0x160 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5e_probe+0xac3/0x14f0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] auxiliary_bus_probe+0x9d/0xe0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] really_probe+0x1e0/0xaa0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __driver_probe_device+0x219/0x480 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x130 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __driver_attach+0x1e4/0x4d0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] bus_for_each_dev+0x11e/0x1a0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] bus_add_driver+0x3f4/0x5a0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] driver_register+0x20f/0x390 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __auxiliary_driver_register+0x14e/0x260 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5e_init+0x38/0x90 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] vhost_iotlb_itree_augment_rotate+0xcb/0x180 [vhost_iotlb] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x400 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] do_init_module+0x18a/0x620 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] load_module+0x563a/0x7040 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __do_sys_finit_module+0x122/0x1d0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] irq event stamp: 3596508 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] hardirqs last enabled at (3596508): [<ffffffff813687c2>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa2/0x100 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] hardirqs last disabled at (3596507): [<ffffffff813687da>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0xba/0x100 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] softirqs last enabled at (3596488): [<ffffffff81368a2a>] irq_exit_rcu+0x11a/0x170 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] softirqs last disabled at (3596495): [<ffffffff81368a2a>] irq_exit_rcu+0x11a/0x170 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] other info that might help us debug this: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] CPU0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ---- [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] lock(lag_lock); [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] <Interrupt> [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] lock(lag_lock); [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] *** DEADLOCK *** [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] 4 locks held by swapper/0/0: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] #0: ffffffff84643260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: mlx5e_napi_poll+0x43/0x20a0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] #1: ffffffff84643260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x2d7/0xd60 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] Xilinx#2: ffff888144a18b58 (&br->hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: br_fdb_update+0x301/0x570 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] Xilinx#3: ffffffff84643260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5/0x1d0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] stack backtrace: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0_for_upstream_debug_2022_08_04_16_06 #1 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] Call Trace: [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] <IRQ> [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mark_lock.part.0.cold+0x5f/0x92 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? unwind_next_frame+0x1c4/0x1b50 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xcd/0xdb [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5e_napi_poll+0x4e9/0x20a0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5e_napi_poll+0x4e9/0x20a0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? stack_access_ok+0x1d0/0x1d0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? start_kernel+0x3a7/0x3c5 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __lock_acquire+0x1260/0x6720 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mark_lock.part.0+0xed/0x3060 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? stack_trace_save+0x91/0xc0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb+0x1f/0x120 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? __lock_acquire+0xd6f/0x6720 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb+0x1f/0x120 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb+0x1f/0x120 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5_esw_bridge_rep_vport_num_vhca_id_get+0x1a0/0x600 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5_esw_bridge_update_work+0x90/0x90 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5_esw_bridge_switchdev_event+0x185/0x8f0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5_esw_bridge_port_obj_attr_set+0x3e0/0x3e0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? check_chain_key+0x24a/0x580 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xd7/0x1d0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_switchdev_fdb_notify+0xea/0x100 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_switchdev_set_port_flag+0x310/0x310 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] fdb_notify+0x11b/0x150 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_fdb_update+0x34c/0x570 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_fdb_add_local+0x50/0x50 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_allowed_ingress+0x5f/0x1070 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? check_chain_key+0x24a/0x580 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_handle_frame_finish+0x786/0x18e0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? check_chain_key+0x24a/0x580 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? __lock_acquire+0xd6f/0x6720 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? sctp_inet_bind_verify+0x4d/0x190 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? xlog_unpack_data+0x2e0/0x310 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x227/0x380 [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? setup_pre_routing+0x460/0x460 [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_nf_pre_routing_ipv6+0x48b/0x69c [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_nf_pre_routing_finish_ipv6+0x5c2/0xbf0 [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_nf_pre_routing_ipv6+0x4c6/0x69c [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_validate_ipv6+0x9e0/0x9e0 [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_nf_forward_arp+0xb70/0xb70 [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_nf_pre_routing+0xacf/0x1160 [br_netfilter] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] br_handle_frame+0x8a9/0x1270 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_frame_finish+0x18e0/0x18e0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_local_finish+0x20/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? bond_handle_frame+0xf9/0xac0 [bonding] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? br_handle_frame_finish+0x18e0/0x18e0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x7c0/0x2c70 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? check_chain_key+0x24a/0x580 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? generic_xdp_tx+0x5b0/0x5b0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? __lock_acquire+0xd6f/0x6720 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? check_chain_key+0x24a/0x580 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x2d7/0x8a0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? process_backlog+0x960/0x960 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x129/0x400 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x14/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x5f4/0xd60 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? do_xdp_generic+0x150/0x150 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5e_poll_rx_cq+0xf6b/0x2960 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? mlx5e_poll_ico_cq+0x3d/0x1590 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] napi_complete_done+0x188/0x710 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x4e9/0x20a0 [mlx5_core] [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? __queue_work+0x53c/0xeb0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __napi_poll+0x9f/0x540 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] net_rx_action+0x420/0xb70 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? napi_threaded_poll+0x470/0x470 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? __common_interrupt+0x79/0x1a0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] __do_softirq+0x271/0x92c [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] irq_exit_rcu+0x11a/0x170 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] common_interrupt+0x7d/0xa0 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] </IRQ> [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] <TASK> [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x42/0x60 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] Code: c1 83 e0 07 48 c1 e9 03 83 c0 03 0f b6 14 11 38 d0 7c 04 84 d2 75 14 8b 05 6b f1 22 02 85 c0 7e 07 0f 00 2d 80 3b 4a 00 fb f4 <c3> 48 c7 c7 e0 07 7e 85 e8 21 bd 40 fe eb de 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] RSP: 0018:ffffffff84407e18 EFLAGS: 00000242 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffffff84ec4a68 RCX: 1ffffffff0afc0fc [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff835b1fac [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8884d2c44ac3 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] R10: ffffed109a588958 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 0000000000000000 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] R13: ffffffff84efac20 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? default_idle_call+0xcc/0x460 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] default_idle_call+0xec/0x460 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] do_idle+0x394/0x450 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] ? arch_cpu_idle_exit+0x40/0x40 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] rest_init+0x156/0x250 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] arch_call_rest_init+0xf/0x15 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] start_kernel+0x3a7/0x3c5 [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xcd/0xdb [Sun Aug 7 13:12:29 2022] </TASK> Fixes: ff9b752 ("net/mlx5: Bridge, support LAG") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
Add a lock_class_key per mlx5 device to avoid a false positive "possible circular locking dependency" warning by lockdep, on flows which lock more than one mlx5 device, such as adding SF. kernel log: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.19.0-rc8+ Xilinx#2 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u20:0/8 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88812dfe0d98 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core] but task is already holding lock: ffff888101aa7898 (&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x90/0x150 blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x53/0xa0 mlx5_sf_table_init+0x369/0x4a0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x261/0x490 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x430/0x680 [mlx5_core] local_pci_probe+0xd6/0x170 work_for_cpu_fn+0x4e/0xa0 process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 worker_thread+0x6f6/0xec0 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x2fc7/0x6720 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core] mlx5_sf_dev_probe+0x29c/0x370 [mlx5_core] auxiliary_bus_probe+0x9d/0xe0 really_probe+0x1e0/0xaa0 __driver_probe_device+0x219/0x480 driver_probe_device+0x49/0x130 __device_attach_driver+0x1b8/0x280 bus_for_each_drv+0x123/0x1a0 __device_attach+0x1a3/0x460 bus_probe_device+0x1a2/0x260 device_add+0x9b1/0x1b40 __auxiliary_device_add+0x88/0xc0 mlx5_sf_dev_state_change_handler+0x67e/0x9d0 [mlx5_core] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xd5/0x130 mlx5_vhca_state_work_handler+0x2b0/0x3f0 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem); lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex); lock(&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem); lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u20:0/8: #0: ffff888150612938 ((wq_completion)mlx5_events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x6e2/0x1340 #1: ffff888100cafdb8 ((work_completion)(&work->work)Xilinx#3){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x70f/0x1340 Xilinx#2: ffff888101aa7898 (&(¬ifier->n_head)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0x130 Xilinx#3: ffff88813682d0e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at:__device_attach+0x76/0x460 stack backtrace: CPU: 6 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u20:0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: mlx5_events mlx5_vhca_state_work_handler [mlx5_core] Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d check_noncircular+0x278/0x300 ? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460 ? lock_chain_count+0x20/0x20 ? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880 __lock_acquire+0x2fc7/0x6720 ? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880 ? register_lock_class+0x1880/0x1880 lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x550 ? mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 __mutex_lock+0x12c/0x14b0 ? mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x1f/0x30 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1320/0x1320 ? __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x306/0x490 ? mlx5_sf_dev_probe+0x269/0x370 [mlx5_core] ? iounmap+0x160/0x160 mlx5_init_one+0x2e/0x490 [mlx5_core] mlx5_sf_dev_probe+0x29c/0x370 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5_sf_dev_remove+0x130/0x130 [mlx5_core] auxiliary_bus_probe+0x9d/0xe0 really_probe+0x1e0/0xaa0 __driver_probe_device+0x219/0x480 ? auxiliary_match_id+0xe9/0x140 driver_probe_device+0x49/0x130 __device_attach_driver+0x1b8/0x280 ? driver_allows_async_probing+0x140/0x140 bus_for_each_drv+0x123/0x1a0 ? bus_for_each_dev+0x1a0/0x1a0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2d/0x100 __device_attach+0x1a3/0x460 ? device_driver_attach+0x1e0/0x1e0 ? kobject_uevent_env+0x22d/0xf10 bus_probe_device+0x1a2/0x260 device_add+0x9b1/0x1b40 ? dev_set_name+0xab/0xe0 ? __fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers+0x260/0x260 ? memset+0x20/0x40 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x21a/0x7d0 __auxiliary_device_add+0x88/0xc0 ? auxiliary_device_init+0x86/0xa0 mlx5_sf_dev_state_change_handler+0x67e/0x9d0 [mlx5_core] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xd5/0x130 mlx5_vhca_state_work_handler+0x2b0/0x3f0 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5_vhca_event_arm+0x100/0x100 [mlx5_core] ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6e0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x286/0x400 process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1340 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x230/0x230 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 ? process_one_work+0x1340/0x1340 kthread+0x28f/0x330 ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Fixes: 6a32732 ("net/mlx5: SF, Port function state change support") Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
To clear the flow table on flow table free, the following sequence normally happens in order: 1) gc_step work is stopped to disable any further stats/del requests. 2) All flow table entries are set to teardown state. 3) Run gc_step which will queue HW del work for each flow table entry. 4) Waiting for the above del work to finish (flush). 5) Run gc_step again, deleting all entries from the flow table. 6) Flow table is freed. But if a flow table entry already has pending HW stats or HW add work step 3 will not queue HW del work (it will be skipped), step 4 will wait for the pending add/stats to finish, and step 5 will queue HW del work which might execute after freeing of the flow table. To fix the above, this patch flushes the pending work, then it sets the teardown flag to all flows in the flowtable and it forces a garbage collector run to queue work to remove the flows from hardware, then it flushes this new pending work and (finally) it forces another garbage collector run to remove the entry from the software flowtable. Stack trace: [47773.882335] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in down_read+0x99/0x460 [47773.883634] Write of size 8 at addr ffff888103b45aa8 by task kworker/u20:6/543704 [47773.885634] CPU: 3 PID: 543704 Comm: kworker/u20:6 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc7+ Xilinx#2 [47773.886745] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) [47773.888438] Workqueue: nf_ft_offload_del flow_offload_work_handler [nf_flow_table] [47773.889727] Call Trace: [47773.890214] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107 [47773.890818] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x18/0x140 [47773.892990] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [47773.894459] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 [47773.895174] down_read+0x99/0x460 [47773.899706] nf_flow_offload_tuple+0x24f/0x3c0 [nf_flow_table] [47773.907137] flow_offload_work_handler+0x72d/0xbe0 [nf_flow_table] [47773.913372] process_one_work+0x8ac/0x14e0 [47773.921325] [47773.921325] Allocated by task 592159: [47773.922031] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [47773.922730] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7a/0x90 [47773.923411] tcf_ct_flow_table_get+0x3cb/0x1230 [act_ct] [47773.924363] tcf_ct_init+0x71c/0x1156 [act_ct] [47773.925207] tcf_action_init_1+0x45b/0x700 [47773.925987] tcf_action_init+0x453/0x6b0 [47773.926692] tcf_exts_validate+0x3d0/0x600 [47773.927419] fl_change+0x757/0x4a51 [cls_flower] [47773.928227] tc_new_tfilter+0x89a/0x2070 [47773.936652] [47773.936652] Freed by task 543704: [47773.937303] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [47773.938039] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 [47773.938731] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 [47773.939467] __kasan_slab_free+0xe7/0x120 [47773.940194] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x86/0x190 [47773.941038] kfree+0xce/0x3a0 [47773.941644] tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work Original patch description and stack trace by Paul Blakey. Fixes: c29f74e ("netfilter: nf_flow_table: hardware offload support") Reported-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
Yu Zhao reported a bug after the commit "mm/swap: Add swp_offset_pfn() to fetch PFN from swap entry" added a check in swp_offset_pfn() for swap type [1]: kernel BUG at include/linux/swapops.h:117! CPU: 46 PID: 5245 Comm: EventManager_De Tainted: G S O L 6.0.0-dbg-DEV Xilinx#2 RIP: 0010:pfn_swap_entry_to_page+0x72/0xf0 Code: c6 48 8b 36 48 83 fe ff 74 53 48 01 d1 48 83 c1 08 48 8b 09 f6 c1 01 75 7b 66 90 48 89 c1 48 8b 09 f6 c1 01 74 74 5d c3 eb 9e <0f> 0b 48 ba ff ff ff ff 03 00 00 00 eb ae a9 ff 0f 00 00 75 13 48 RSP: 0018:ffffa59e73fabb80 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 00000000ffffffe8 RBX: 0c00000000000000 RCX: ffffcd5440000000 RDX: 1ffffffffff7a80a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0c0000000000042b RBP: ffffa59e73fabb80 R08: ffff9965ca6e8bb8 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffffa5a2f62d R11: 0000030b372e9fff R12: ffff997b79db5738 R13: 000000000000042b R14: 0c0000000000042b R15: 1ffffffffff7a80a FS: 00007f549d1bb700(0000) GS:ffff99d3cf680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000440d035b3180 CR3: 0000002243176004 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> change_pte_range+0x36e/0x880 change_p4d_range+0x2e8/0x670 change_protection_range+0x14e/0x2c0 mprotect_fixup+0x1ee/0x330 do_mprotect_pkey+0x34c/0x440 __x64_sys_mprotect+0x1d/0x30 It triggers because pfn_swap_entry_to_page() could be called upon e.g. a genuine swap entry. Fix it by only calling it when it's a write migration entry where the page* is used. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAOUHufaVC2Za-p8m0aiHw6YkheDcrO-C3wRGixwDS32VTS+k1w@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220823221138.45602-1-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: 6c28760 ("mm: remember exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reported-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Tested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
Syzkaller reports the following problem:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/printk/printk.c:2347
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1105, name: syz-executor423
3 locks held by syz-executor423/1105:
#0: ffff8881468b9098 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}-{0:0}, at: tty_ldisc_ref_wait+0x22/0x90 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:266
#1: ffff8881468b9130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: tty_write_lock drivers/tty/tty_io.c:952 [inline]
#1: ffff8881468b9130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:975 [inline]
#1: ffff8881468b9130 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: file_tty_write.constprop.0+0x2a8/0x8e0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1118
Xilinx#2: ffff88801b06c398 (&gsm->tx_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: gsmld_write+0x5e/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2717
irq event stamp: 3482
hardirqs last enabled at (3481): [<ffffffff81d13343>] __get_reqs_available+0x143/0x2f0 fs/aio.c:946
hardirqs last disabled at (3482): [<ffffffff87d39722>] __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:108 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (3482): [<ffffffff87d39722>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x52/0x60 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
softirqs last enabled at (3408): [<ffffffff87e01002>] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
softirqs last disabled at (3401): [<ffffffff87e01002>] asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
Preemption disabled at:
[<0000000000000000>] 0x0
CPU: 2 PID: 1105 Comm: syz-executor423 Not tainted 5.10.137-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x107/0x167 lib/dump_stack.c:118
___might_sleep.cold+0x1e8/0x22e kernel/sched/core.c:7304
console_lock+0x19/0x80 kernel/printk/printk.c:2347
do_con_write+0x113/0x1de0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:2909
con_write+0x22/0xc0 drivers/tty/vt/vt.c:3296
gsmld_write+0xd0/0x150 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2720
do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1028 [inline]
file_tty_write.constprop.0+0x502/0x8e0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1118
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1903 [inline]
aio_write+0x355/0x7b0 fs/aio.c:1580
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1952 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xf45/0x1a90 fs/aio.c:1999
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2058 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:2028 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x18c/0x2f0 fs/aio.c:2028
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
The problem happens in the following control flow:
gsmld_write(...)
spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm->tx_lock, flags) // taken a spinlock on TX data
con_write(...)
do_con_write(...)
console_lock()
might_sleep() // -> bug
As far as console_lock() might sleep it should not be called with
spinlock held.
The patch replaces tx_lock spinlock with mutex in order to avoid the
problem.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
Fixes: 32dd59f ("tty: n_gsm: fix race condition in gsmld_write()")
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829131640.69254-3-pchelkin@ispras.ru
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
A recent commit expanding the scope of the udc_lock mutex in the
gadget core managed to cause an obscure and slightly bizarre lockdep
violation. In abbreviated form:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc7+ #12510 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
udevadm/312 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff80000aae1058 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0
but task is already holding lock:
ffff000002277548 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x34/0xe0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> Xilinx#3 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
__kernfs_remove+0x268/0x380
kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x58/0xac
sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x18/0x24
device_del+0x15c/0x440
-> Xilinx#2 (device_links_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
__mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64
device_link_remove+0x3c/0xa0
_regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x190
regulator_put+0x3c/0x54
devm_regulator_release+0x14/0x20
-> #1 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
__mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64
regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x284
regulator_enable+0x34/0x80
phy_power_on+0x24/0x130
__dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x100/0x130
dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x18/0x40
dwc2_hsotg_udc_start+0x6c/0x2f0
gadget_bind_driver+0x124/0x1f4
-> #0 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1298/0x20cc
lock_acquire.part.0+0xe0/0x230
lock_acquire+0x68/0x84
__mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64
usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0
Evidently this was caused by the scope of udc_mutex being too large.
The mutex is only meant to protect udc->driver along with a few other
things. As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the mutex to be
held while the gadget core calls a gadget driver's ->bind or ->unbind
routine, or while a UDC is being started or stopped. (This accounts
for link #1 in the chain above, where the mutex is held while the
dwc2_hsotg_udc is started as part of driver probing.)
Gadget drivers' ->disconnect callbacks are problematic. Even though
usb_gadget_disconnect() will now acquire the udc_mutex, there's a
window in usb_gadget_bind_driver() between the times when the mutex is
released and the ->bind callback is invoked. If a disconnect occurred
during that window, we could call the driver's ->disconnect routine
before its ->bind routine. To prevent this from happening, it will be
necessary to prevent a UDC from connecting while it has no gadget
driver. This should be done already but it doesn't seem to be;
currently usb_gadget_connect() has no check for this. Such a check
will have to be added later.
Some degree of mutual exclusion is required in soft_connect_store(),
which can dereference udc->driver at arbitrary times since it is a
sysfs callback. The solution here is to acquire the gadget's device
lock rather than the udc_mutex. Since the driver core guarantees that
the device lock is always held during driver binding and unbinding,
this will make the accesses in soft_connect_store() mutually exclusive
with any changes to udc->driver.
Lastly, it turns out there is one place which should hold the
udc_mutex but currently does not: The function_show() routine needs
protection while it dereferences udc->driver. The missing lock and
unlock calls are added.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b2ba4245-9917-e399-94c8-03a383e7070e@samsung.com/
Fixes: 2191c00 ("USB: gadget: Fix use-after-free Read in usb_udc_uevent()")
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YwkfhdxA/I2nOcK7@rowland.harvard.edu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
Because rxrpc pretends to be a tunnel on top of a UDP/UDP6 socket, allowing it to siphon off UDP packets early in the handling of received UDP packets thereby avoiding the packet going through the UDP receive queue, it doesn't get ICMP packets through the UDP ->sk_error_report() callback. In fact, it doesn't appear that there's any usable option for getting hold of ICMP packets. Fix this by adding a new UDP encap hook to distribute error messages for UDP tunnels. If the hook is set, then the tunnel driver will be able to see ICMP packets. The hook provides the offset into the packet of the UDP header of the original packet that caused the notification. An alternative would be to call the ->error_handler() hook - but that requires that the skbuff be cloned (as ip_icmp_error() or ipv6_cmp_error() do, though isn't really necessary or desirable in rxrpc's case is we want to parse them there and then, not queue them). Changes ======= ver Xilinx#3) - Fixed an uninitialised variable. ver Xilinx#2) - Fixed some missing CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_IPV6 conditionals. Fixes: 5271953 ("rxrpc: Use the UDP encap_rcv hook") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
The driver incorrectly frees client instance and subsequent i40e module removal leads to kernel crash. Reproducer: 1. Do ethtool offline test followed immediately by another one host# ethtool -t eth0 offline; ethtool -t eth0 offline 2. Remove recursively irdma module that also removes i40e module host# modprobe -r irdma Result: [ 8675.035651] i40e 0000:3d:00.0 eno1: offline testing starting [ 8675.193774] i40e 0000:3d:00.0 eno1: testing finished [ 8675.201316] i40e 0000:3d:00.0 eno1: offline testing starting [ 8675.358921] i40e 0000:3d:00.0 eno1: testing finished [ 8675.496921] i40e 0000:3d:00.0: IRDMA hardware initialization FAILED init_state=2 status=-110 [ 8686.188955] i40e 0000:3d:00.1: i40e_ptp_stop: removed PHC on eno2 [ 8686.943890] i40e 0000:3d:00.1: Deleted LAN device PF1 bus=0x3d dev=0x00 func=0x01 [ 8686.952669] i40e 0000:3d:00.0: i40e_ptp_stop: removed PHC on eno1 [ 8687.761787] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000030 [ 8687.768755] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 8687.773895] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 8687.779034] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 8687.781575] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 8687.785935] CPU: 51 PID: 172891 Comm: rmmod Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W I 5.19.0+ Xilinx#2 [ 8687.794800] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFD/S2600WFD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.0X.02.0001.051420190324 05/14/2019 [ 8687.805222] RIP: 0010:i40e_lan_del_device+0x13/0xb0 [i40e] [ 8687.810719] Code: d4 84 c0 0f 84 b8 25 01 00 e9 9c 25 01 00 41 bc f4 ff ff ff eb 91 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 55 53 48 8b 87 58 08 00 00 48 89 fb <48> 8b 68 30 48 89 ef e8 21 8a 0f d5 48 89 ef e8 a9 78 0f d5 48 8b [ 8687.829462] RSP: 0018:ffffa604072efce0 EFLAGS: 00010202 [ 8687.834689] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8f43833b2000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 8687.841821] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8f4b0545b298 RDI: ffff8f43833b2000 [ 8687.848955] RBP: ffff8f43833b2000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 8687.856086] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000ffffffffff000 R12: ffff8f43833b2ef0 [ 8687.863218] R13: ffff8f43833b2ef0 R14: ffff915103966000 R15: ffff8f43833b2008 [ 8687.870342] FS: 00007f79501c3740(0000) GS:ffff8f4adffc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 8687.878427] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 8687.884174] CR2: 0000000000000030 CR3: 000000014276e004 CR4: 00000000007706e0 [ 8687.891306] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 8687.898441] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 8687.905572] PKRU: 55555554 [ 8687.908286] Call Trace: [ 8687.910737] <TASK> [ 8687.912843] i40e_remove+0x2c0/0x330 [i40e] [ 8687.917040] pci_device_remove+0x33/0xa0 [ 8687.920962] device_release_driver_internal+0x1aa/0x230 [ 8687.926188] driver_detach+0x44/0x90 [ 8687.929770] bus_remove_driver+0x55/0xe0 [ 8687.933693] pci_unregister_driver+0x2a/0xb0 [ 8687.937967] i40e_exit_module+0xc/0xf48 [i40e] Two offline tests cause IRDMA driver failure (ETIMEDOUT) and this failure is indicated back to i40e_client_subtask() that calls i40e_client_del_instance() to free client instance referenced by pf->cinst and sets this pointer to NULL. During the module removal i40e_remove() calls i40e_lan_del_device() that dereferences pf->cinst that is NULL -> crash. Do not remove client instance when client open callbacks fails and just clear __I40E_CLIENT_INSTANCE_OPENED bit. The driver also needs to take care about this situation (when netdev is up and client is NOT opened) in i40e_notify_client_of_netdev_close() and calls client close callback only when __I40E_CLIENT_INSTANCE_OPENED is set. Fixes: 0ef2d5a ("i40e: KISS the client interface") Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> Tested-by: Helena Anna Dubel <helena.anna.dubel@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
houlz0507
pushed a commit
to houlz0507/linux-xoclv2
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
The SRv6 layer allows defining HMAC data that can later be used to sign IPv6 Segment Routing Headers. This configuration is realised via netlink through four attributes: SEG6_ATTR_HMACKEYID, SEG6_ATTR_SECRET, SEG6_ATTR_SECRETLEN and SEG6_ATTR_ALGID. Because the SECRETLEN attribute is decoupled from the actual length of the SECRET attribute, it is possible to provide invalid combinations (e.g., secret = "", secretlen = 64). This case is not checked in the code and with an appropriately crafted netlink message, an out-of-bounds read of up to 64 bytes (max secret length) can occur past the skb end pointer and into skb_shared_info: Breakpoint 1, seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 208 memcpy(hinfo->secret, secret, slen); (gdb) bt #0 seg6_genl_sethmac (skb=<optimized out>, info=<optimized out>) at net/ipv6/seg6.c:208 #1 0xffffffff81e012e9 in genl_family_rcv_msg_doit (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=nlh@entry=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=extack@entry=0xffffc90000ba7af0, ops=ops@entry=0xffffc90000ba7a80, hdrlen=4, net=0xffffffff84237580 <init_net>, family=<optimized out>, family=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 Xilinx#2 0xffffffff81e01435 in genl_family_rcv_msg (extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, family=0xffffffff82fef6c0 <seg6_genl_family>) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 Xilinx#3 genl_rcv_msg (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, nlh=0xffff88800b1b7600, extack=0xffffc90000ba7af0) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 Xilinx#4 0xffffffff81dfffc3 in netlink_rcv_skb (skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, cb=cb@entry=0xffffffff81e01350 <genl_rcv_msg>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 Xilinx#5 0xffffffff81e00919 in genl_rcv (skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00) at net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 Xilinx#6 0xffffffff81dff6ae in netlink_unicast_kernel (ssk=0xffff888010eec800, skb=0xffff88800b1f9f00, sk=0xffff888004aed000) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 Xilinx#7 netlink_unicast (ssk=ssk@entry=0xffff888010eec800, skb=skb@entry=0xffff88800b1f9f00, portid=portid@entry=0, nonblock=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 Xilinx#8 0xffffffff81dff9a4 in netlink_sendmsg (sock=<optimized out>, msg=0xffffc90000ba7e48, len=<optimized out>) at net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 ... (gdb) p/x ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->head + ((struct sk_buff *)0xffff88800b1f9f00)->end $1 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p/x secret $2 = 0xffff88800b1b76c0 (gdb) p slen $3 = 64 '@' The OOB data can then be read back from userspace by dumping HMAC state. This commit fixes this by ensuring SECRETLEN cannot exceed the actual length of SECRET. Reported-by: Lucas Leong <wmliang.tw@gmail.com> Tested: verified that EINVAL is correctly returned when secretlen > len(secret) Fixes: 4f4853d ("ipv6: sr: implement API to control SR HMAC structure") Signed-off-by: David Lebrun <dlebrun@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.