Update to embedded-sensors v0.3.0#21
Merged
Merged
Conversation
tullom
previously approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
jerrysxie
previously approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
Member
Author
|
Had to rebase for merge conflicts. |
jerrysxie
previously approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
felipebalbi
reviewed
Jun 20, 2025
tullom
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2025
jerrysxie
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2025
This was referenced Jul 28, 2025
Merged
Member
Author
Thank you, posted announcement to Discord. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates to
embedded-sensorsv0.3.0, introducing breaking changes to the API requiring update oftmp108version from v0.2.0 to v0.3.0.MSRV changed to 1.84 to be able to use f32::abs from core (which was moved from std). Alternatives are to use silent integer truncation instead of checking for float equality within an epsilon, but that might result in behavior caller does not expect.