Skip to content

Use consistent PSyclone config for building adjoint_tests - #331

Merged
Iva Kavcic (TeranIvy) merged 3 commits into
MetOffice:mainfrom
DrTVockerodtMO:adjt_psyclone_config_fix
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

Use consistent PSyclone config for building adjoint_tests#331
Iva Kavcic (TeranIvy) merged 3 commits into
MetOffice:mainfrom
DrTVockerodtMO:adjt_psyclone_config_fix

Conversation

@DrTVockerodtMO

@DrTVockerodtMO DrTVockerodtMO commented Mar 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Summary

Sci/Tech Reviewer: Josh Colclough (@mo-joshuacolclough)
Code Reviewer: Iva Kavcic (@TeranIvy)

Fix to make the adjoint_tests application export its custom PSyclone config as opposed to explicitly passing it into the import scripts. This is mainly to make local parallel runs of the adjoint_tests application work, which is a prerequisite for a fully fledged parallel adjoint_tests run on the test-suite.

We found that using the current Makefile caused some of the generated PSy layer to use the default PSyclone config, and others used the custom adjoint_tests PSyclone config. This causes some PSy layer code to iterate into halos/annexed dofs which when using the adjoint_tests application causes floating point errors during parallel runs. The new Makefile ensures the configuration is consistent and the floating point errors diminish.

Note that I could have also ammended some of the logic for the adjoint import.mk script, but since we are moving away from live building with PSyAd (see #330 ) I opted not to change this at this time.

Code Quality Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • Comments have been included that aid understanding and enhance the readability of the code
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • All automated checks in the CI pipeline have completed successfully

Testing

  • I have tested this change locally, using the LFRic Apps rose-stem suite
  • If any tests fail (rose-stem or CI) the reason is understood and acceptable (e.g. kgo changes)
  • I have added tests to cover new functionality as appropriate (e.g. system tests, unit tests, etc.)
  • Any new tests have been assigned an appropriate amount of compute resource and have been allocated to an appropriate testing group (i.e. the developer tests are for jobs which use a small amount of compute resource and complete in a matter of minutes)

trac.log

Test Suite Results - lfric_apps - adjt_psyclone_config_fix/run1

Suite Information

Item Value
Suite Name adjt_psyclone_config_fix/run1
Suite User terence.vockerodt
Workflow Start 2026-03-05T14:06:23
Groups Run developer
Dependency Reference Main Like
casim MetOffice/casim@2026.03.1 True
jules MetOffice/jules@2026.03.1 True
lfric_apps DrTVockerodtMO/lfric_apps@adjt_psyclone_config_fix False
lfric_core MetOffice/lfric_core@2026.03.1 True
moci MetOffice/moci@2026.03.1 True
SimSys_Scripts MetOffice/SimSys_Scripts@2026.03.1 True
socrates MetOffice/socrates@2026.03.1 True
socrates-spectral MetOffice/socrates-spectral@2026.03.1 True
ukca MetOffice/ukca@2026.03.1 True

Task Information

✅ succeeded tasks - 1164

Security Considerations

  • I have reviewed my changes for potential security issues
  • Sensitive data is properly handled (if applicable)
  • Authentication and authorisation are properly implemented (if applicable)

Performance Impact

  • Performance of the code has been considered and, if applicable, suitable performance measurements have been conducted

AI Assistance and Attribution

  • Some of the content of this change has been produced with the assistance of Generative AI tool name (e.g., Met Office Github Copilot Enterprise, Github Copilot Personal, ChatGPT GPT-4, etc) and I have followed the Simulation Systems AI policy (including attribution labels)

Documentation

  • Where appropriate I have updated documentation related to this change and confirmed that it builds correctly

PSyclone Approval

  • If you have edited any PSyclone-related code (e.g. PSyKAl-lite, Kernel interface, optimisation scripts, LFRic data structure code) then please contact the TCD Team

Sci/Tech Review

  • I understand this area of code and the changes being added
  • The proposed changes correspond to the pull request description
  • Documentation is sufficient (do documentation papers need updating)
  • Sufficient testing has been completed

(Please alert the code reviewer via a tag when you have approved the SR)

Code Review

  • All dependencies have been resolved
  • Related Issues have been properly linked and addressed
  • CLA compliance has been confirmed
  • Code quality standards have been met
  • Tests are adequate and have passed
  • Documentation is complete and accurate
  • Security considerations have been addressed
  • Performance impact is acceptable

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the update DrTVockerodtMO. Glad the multi-PE adjoint_tests is working now. Passes Sci/Tech review.

@DrTVockerodtMO DrTVockerodtMO added this to the Summer 2026 milestone Mar 5, 2026

@TeranIvy Iva Kavcic (TeranIvy) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review

Checked out the updated version of the fork and ran the all group test suite on Az Spice and EX. All green.

The code changes are clear, well-justified and follow LFRic development practices.

Approved and proceeding to merge.

@TeranIvy
Iva Kavcic (TeranIvy) merged commit 370c60d into MetOffice:main Mar 6, 2026
13 checks passed
@DrTVockerodtMO
DrTVockerodtMO deleted the adjt_psyclone_config_fix branch March 6, 2026 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adjoint tests mixes PSyclone configs

4 participants