Skip to content

Some of the results are full of noise. #93

Description

@TMDTom

Some of the results are full of noise. And there are few results successful to me. Maybe like this.
image

image

Activity

  1. SarielMa commented on Apr 25, 2024

    @SarielMa

    I had the same issue when I adopted the colorization data loader to my own MR Image translation task. When I removed the normalization in the transforms, the noise was gone. But the psnr and ssim were very poor.

  2. TMDTom commented on Apr 26, 2024

    @TMDTom
    Author

    I had the same issue when I adopted the colorization data loader to my own MR Image translation task. When I removed the normalization in the transforms, the noise was gone. But the psnr and ssim were very poor.

    Ok, thanks for your answer. I'll have a try on it. Normalization maybe is connected by your data distribution.

  3. AwayGithub commented on Mar 15, 2025

    @AwayGithub

    @TMDTom @SarielMa Now my MRI translation task meets the same problem, around 80% of the outputs are successful, and the rest are very noisy. And this happens after I set the noise scheduler to "cosine", before that, I couldn't even get a single successful output. So did you solve the problem? And how? Thanks a lot!

  4. jjjje commented on May 23, 2025

    @jjjje

    @AwayGithub
    I also have same issue.
    I trained and tested my own dataset.
    But my test results are some of them were good and some of them were just noise.
    My dataset was 580 size of 256*256 and I use colorization method.
    I check every 1000 epoch until 5000epochs. and It was getting better but still have randomly noise results.
    Did you solve it?

  5. TMDTom commented on May 23, 2025

    @TMDTom
    Author

    @AwayGithub I also have same issue. I trained and tested my own dataset. But my test results are some of them were good and some of them were just noise. My dataset was 580 size of 256*256 and I use colorization method. I check every 1000 epoch until 5000epochs. and It was getting better but still have randomly noise results. Did you solve it?

    Maybe you can try the way: change the initial data distribution to 0-1 or -1-1.

  6. jjjje commented on May 23, 2025

    @jjjje

    @TMDTom Thank you for your answer.
    I already normalize my dataset into -1~1...
    Now your experiments results didn't show noise? solve the problem? can i ask how many your train dataset?

  7. TMDTom commented on May 23, 2025

    @TMDTom
    Author

    @TMDTom Thank you for your answer. I already normalize my dataset into -1~1... Now your experiments results didn't show noise? solve the problem?

    I remember solving it by normalizing to either 0-1 or -1 to 1.

  8. jjjje commented on May 23, 2025

    @jjjje

    @TMDTom Thank you.
    I'm thinking of increasing my dataset..
    can i ask how many was your train dataset?

  9. TMDTom commented on May 23, 2025

    @TMDTom
    Author

    @TMDTom Thank you. I'm thinking of increasing my dataset.. can i ask how many was your train dataset?

    My dataset contains 1,200 training images, and I trained for 100 epochs with the batch_size set to 1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions