Catch agnostic HTTPError base in rabbitmq and swap the test

[mwdd146980]

What does this PR do?

Widens the _get_data() exception catch in the RabbitMQ check to also catch the backend-agnostic HTTPError base alongside the existing requests RequestException. The unit test injection swaps to the agnostic HTTPStatusError instance.

Motivation

Part of the httpx migration. Once the HTTP layer can raise agnostic errors, a catch that only knows RequestException would let an agnostic status error escape _get_data instead of being re-raised as RabbitMQException. Widening the catch keeps the check correct under either backend. There is no observable behavior change under the shipped requests backend, which never raises the agnostic type.

Verification

Verified red-then-green. With HTTPStatusError("error") injected but _get_data still catching only RequestException, the agnostic error escapes the clause and test__get_data fails with HTTPStatusError (not a TypeError, confirming the instance form is correct). Widening the catch to (RequestException, HTTPError) makes it pass. The full rabbitmq unit suite is green.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

• Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
• Add qa/required if this PR needs QA validation, or qa/skip-qa if it does not. Exactly one of the two is required.
• If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[datadog-official]

   

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 8 Pipeline jobs failed

PR | test / test-minimum-base-package (linux, ubuntu-22.04, rabbitmq, RabbitMQ (py3.13-3.11-mgmt), py3.13-3.1... / minimum-base-package-RabbitMQ (py3.13-3.11-mgmt)-py3.13-3.11-mgmt     

PR | test / test-minimum-base-package (linux, ubuntu-22.04, rabbitmq, RabbitMQ (py3.13-3.11-openmetrics), py3... / minimum-base-package-RabbitMQ (py3.13-3.11-openmetrics)-py3.13-3.11-openmetrics     

PR | test / test-minimum-base-package (linux, ubuntu-22.04, rabbitmq, RabbitMQ (py3.13-3.7-mgmt), py3.13-3.7-... / minimum-base-package-RabbitMQ (py3.13-3.7-mgmt)-py3.13-3.7-mgmt     

View all 8 failed jobs.

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 95.40% (+7.24%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 672456a | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[mwdd146980]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 672456a2df

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[dd-octo-sts]

Validation Report

Validation	Description	Status
dep	Verify dependency pins are consistent and Agent-compatible	❌

Run ddev validate all changed --fix to attempt to auto-fix supported validations.

Passed validations (20)

Validation	Description	Status
agent-reqs	Verify check versions match the Agent requirements file	✅
ci	Validate CI configuration and code coverage settings	✅
codeowners	Validate every integration has a CODEOWNERS entry	✅
config	Validate default configuration files against spec.yaml	✅
http	Validate integrations use the HTTP wrapper correctly	✅
imports	Validate check imports do not use deprecated modules	✅
integration-style	Validate check code style conventions	✅
jmx-metrics	Validate JMX metrics definition files and config	✅
labeler	Validate PR labeler config matches integration directories	✅
legacy-signature	Validate no integration uses the legacy Agent check signature	✅
license-headers	Validate Python files have proper license headers	✅
licenses	Validate third-party license attribution list	✅
metadata	Validate metadata.csv metric definitions	✅
models	Validate configuration data models match spec.yaml	✅
openmetrics	Validate OpenMetrics integrations disable the metric limit	✅
package	Validate Python package metadata and naming	✅
qa-label	Validate the pull request declares whether it needs QA for the next Agent release	✅
readmes	Validate README files have required sections	✅
saved-views	Validate saved view JSON file structure and fields	✅
version	Validate version consistency between package and changelog	✅

View full run

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 672456a2df

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".