feat: add Docker support with multi-stage build, Nginx configuration,…#111
feat: add Docker support with multi-stage build, Nginx configuration,…#111kpj2006 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
… and Docker Compose orchestration
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 34 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis PR adds Docker containerization support: a multi-stage Dockerfile building the app with Node and serving it via Nginx, a custom nginx.conf for SPA routing and gzip, a docker-compose.yml service definition, a .dockerignore file, and README documentation for Docker usage. ChangesDocker Support
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)Not applicable — changes are configuration/documentation additions without multi-component runtime interaction to visualize. Suggested labels: Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@Dockerfile`:
- Around line 17-27: Add a HEALTHCHECK to the nginx stage in the Dockerfile so
Docker/Compose can verify the container is actually serving HTTP. Update the
final nginx image block that currently contains the COPY, EXPOSE, and CMD
directives to include a lightweight probe against the served site (for example
via localhost) and mark the container unhealthy on failed responses. Keep the
check near the nginx runtime configuration so it’s easy to find alongside the
existing CMD and EXPOSE instructions.
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 319-334: Add blank lines before and after each fenced code block
in the Docker usage sections of README.md to satisfy MD031; update the examples
around the build/run commands so the list items in the Docker Compose and Docker
CLI sections have empty lines surrounding the ```bash fences, keeping the
surrounding numbered steps intact.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 63f98cad-5823-4b92-9646-03d2cc8e19ad
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.dockerignoreDockerfileREADME.mddocker-compose.ymlnginx.conf
… and Docker Compose orchestration
Addressed Issues:
Fixes #(issue number)
Screenshots/Recordings:
Additional Notes:
Checklist
We encourage contributors to use AI tools responsibly when creating Pull Requests. While AI can be a valuable aid, it is essential to ensure that your contributions meet the task requirements, build successfully, include relevant tests, and pass all linters. Submissions that do not meet these standards may be closed without warning to maintain the quality and integrity of the project. Please take the time to understand the changes you are proposing and their impact.
Summary by CodeRabbit